Scholarly reviewers this volume

Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers

The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous ...

Reviewers for Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Volume 1, 2005

The Editor-in-Chief would like to acknowledge the help of the following in reviewing papers published in Volume 1 of Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment.

Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, Volume 24, List of Reviewers

Preface: the History of This Volume

User modeling is now approaching its second decade. Its exact age, however, is difficult to determine. Was it born in 1978, when Allen, Cohen, and Perrault started to publish their seminal papers on dialog processing in natural language systems based on Searle's theory of speech acts and the speaker's intentions behind it? Or was it in 1979, when Elain Rich reported on her GRUNDY system, which ...

ERJ peer reviewers: does this pillar of the Journal's quality need help?

+ T he European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) has a long history of success [1]. This success, which has allowed the Journal to keep its impact factor (IF) above 5 for 5 consecutive years, has been paralleled by the impressive growth of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and its membership [2]. No doubt, a strong society needs a strong journal. In order to be effective, each individual manuscri...